7,568 judgments 29,982 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

Phillip Hinds v Conyers Dill and Pearman (A Firm)

G 0065 OF 2018 · 2019-Aug-13

Civil Practice and Procedure - Striking Out - Order 18, Rule 19(1) of the GCR - whether claim an abuse of process - whether frivolous or vexatious - whether collateral attack on judgment - whether manifest unfairness to party to litigation - whether claim would bring the administration of justice into disrepute

Full metadata

The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.

Find similar
Related public-register entries