Judgment
R v Adam Rankine - Judgment
SCA 0169/1991 · 1992-07-31
Adequacy and sufficiency of magistrates' judgments for appellate review; Appeal against convictions for handling stolen goods; Whether failure to provide reasons for conviction constituted a fatal procedural defect; Assessment of evidential sufficiency and safety of convictions; Substantial miscarriage of justice arising from deficiencies in the trial record; Appellate powers to quash unsafe and unsatisfactory convictions
Full metadata
| Cause Number | SCA 0169/1991 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Crim) |
| Judge | Harre J |
| Parties | R v Adam Rankine - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 1992-07-31 |
| Subject | Adequacy and sufficiency of magistrates' judgments for appellate review; Appeal against convictions for handling stolen goods; Whether failure to provide reasons for conviction constituted a fatal procedural defect; Assessment of evidential sufficiency and safety of convictions; Substantial miscarriage of justice arising from deficiencies in the trial record; Appellate powers to quash unsafe and unsatisfactory convictions |
| Filename (current) | 92-07-31-R-v-Adam-Rankine.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.