Judgment
Annette Andrade v Patrice Frederick
G 0026 OF 2014 · 2021-Feb-02
Statutory Interpretation - Presumption against Implied Repeal - Rule in Pepper v Hart - even if conditions of admissibility met, court must be wary of being too ready to give effect to what was said by sponsor Bill - English Limitations Act of 1623 (21 James I, Cap 16) - Limitation period for personal injury claims in Insurance Vehicle ( Third Party Risks) Law (2021 Revision)- bar of claims against the insured after three years not impliedly repealed by Limitation Law - decisions of court of co- ordinate jurisdiction not to be followed if per incuriam.
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0026 OF 2014 |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2021-Feb-02 |
| Subject | Statutory Interpretation - Presumption against Implied Repeal - Rule in Pepper v Hart - even if conditions of admissibility met, court must be wary of being too ready to give effect to what was said by sponsor Bill - English Limitations Act of 1623 (21 James I, Cap 16) - Limitation period for personal injury claims in Insurance Vehicle ( Third Party Risks) Law (2021 Revision)- bar of claims against the insured after three years not impliedly repealed by Limitation Law - decisions of court of co- ordinate jurisdiction not to be followed if per incuriam. |
| Category | Civil (General) |
| Filename (current) | 5B604UHJ9UIV1F540244FEAA55DBF02D26EC0D54343E1965C3E9.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.
Related public-register entries