In the Matter of IGCF SPV 21 Limited v Al Jomaih Power Limited and Denham Investment Ltd
Exclusive jurisdiction clause in a shareholders agreement governed by English law with respect to a Cayman company (A) stipulating that disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement be litigated in Cayman or London X, Y and Z own the shares in A - A owns a majority stake in a company incorporated in Pakistan (B) B is a regulated utility company in Pakistan and the other shares in B are owned by the Government of Pakistan the shareholders of B are subject to the terms of a sale and purchase agreement governed by Pakistan law - the sole voting share in X and interests in other shareholders of X were transferred and X sought to exercise its rights under the shareholders agreement to require A to appoint new directors to the board of B Y and Z opposed such an appointment and commenced proceedings in Pakistan against X, A and B and the Government of Pakistan and the Pakistan regulatory authorities seeking orders against X and the Pakistan authorities Y and Z also obtained an interim injunction against X X claimed that the commencement of the proceedings in Pakistan were in breach of the exclusive jurisdiction clause and applied for a permanent injunction restraining X and Y from continuing with those proceedings
| Cause Number | FSD 0269 OF 2022 (NSJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2023-Jul-20 |
| Subject | Exclusive jurisdiction clause in a shareholders agreement governed by English law with respect to a Cayman company (A) stipulating that disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement be litigated in Cayman or London X, Y and Z own the shares in A - A owns a majority stake in a company incorporated in Pakistan (B) B is a regulated utility company in Pakistan and the other shares in B are owned by the Government of Pakistan the shareholders of B are subject to the terms of a sale and purchase agreement governed by Pakistan law - the sole voting share in X and interests in other shareholders of X were transferred and X sought to exercise its rights under the shareholders agreement to require A to appoint new directors to the board of B Y and Z opposed such an appointment and commenced proceedings in Pakistan against X, A and B and the Government of Pakistan and the Pakistan regulatory authorities seeking orders against X and the Pakistan authorities Y and Z also obtained an interim injunction against X X claimed that the commencement of the proceedings in Pakistan were in breach of the exclusive jurisdiction clause and applied for a permanent injunction restraining X and Y from continuing with those proceedings |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | 1XH0WJHD7TFD1GH9B214D393445858F5BE4FE23B584E2F1B1C14.pdf |
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | 118, 136 and 160, 159 | 19 |
| Arbitration Act | 34, 4 | 2 |
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.