In the Matter of Arnage Ors v Walkers

Dismissal of recusal applications - absent proper grounds for recusal the judge has a duty to continue presiding over a case - previous decisions or criticism against a party or dissatisfaction with evidence presented on behalf of a party are not, without more, usually proper grounds for recusal - judges are not required to sit mute while legal arguments are being presented and counsel are usually assisted by being informed as to the concerns of the judge in order that they have an opportunity to deal with them before judgment is delivered ? attorneys should not make recusal applications unless they are satisfied that there are justifiable grounds for making them