Dwayne Robin Thompson v The King - Judgment
Application of R v Gorman and jury‑note procedure; communication between judge and jury; whether judge’s handling of ambiguous jury note amounted to material irregularity; propriety of addressing jury in open court before Consulting counsel; judicial discretion not to press jurors for particulars following their second note; adequacy of judicial directions reinforcing impartiality, absence of external influence, and duty to report concerns; whether failure to inquire further created a lurking doubt affecting the safety of verdicts; assessment of whether any handling of jury notes jeopardised fairness; affirmation that convictions for robbery, possession of unlicensed firearm, and possession of ammunition were safe
| Neutral Citation | [2026] CICA (Crim) 3 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | Crim App 0013/2024 |
| Court | CICA (Crim) |
| Judge | Beatson JA, Field JA, Smellie JA |
| Parties | Dwayne Robin Thompson v The King - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2026-02-17 |
| Subject | Application of R v Gorman and jury‑note procedure; communication between judge and jury; whether judge’s handling of ambiguous jury note amounted to material irregularity; propriety of addressing jury in open court before Consulting counsel; judicial discretion not to press jurors for particulars following their second note; adequacy of judicial directions reinforcing impartiality, absence of external influence, and duty to report concerns; whether failure to inquire further created a lurking doubt affecting the safety of verdicts; assessment of whether any handling of jury notes jeopardised fairness; affirmation that convictions for robbery, possession of unlicensed firearm, and possession of ammunition were safe |
| Filename (current) | CICACRIM0013202402172026DWAYNETHOMPSON.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.