Judgment
Eric Bradley and Jacqueline Chuang v Linda Frye-Chaikin - Judgment
[2025] CIGC (Civ) 5
· G 0136/2016 · 2025-01-28
Civil procedure; whether to grant leave to appeal; whether to order stay pending appeal. Use of AI tools to produce submissions; submissions including significant hallucinations; obligation on litigant to verify accuracy of any material produced using AI tools; obligation on attorneys to identify and act upon apparent hallucinations in materials produced by opponents.
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2025] CIGC (Civ) 5 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | G 0136/2016 |
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Asif J |
| Parties | Eric Bradley and Jacqueline Chuang v Linda Frye-Chaikin - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2025-01-28 |
| Subject | Civil procedure; whether to grant leave to appeal; whether to order stay pending appeal. Use of AI tools to produce submissions; submissions including significant hallucinations; obligation on litigant to verify accuracy of any material produced using AI tools; obligation on attorneys to identify and act upon apparent hallucinations in materials produced by opponents. |
| Filename (current) | 25-01-28_bradley_and_anor_v_frye-chaikin_-_judgment.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Court of Appeal Rules (subordinate) | — | 1 |
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.