Judgment
Unicorn Biotech Ventures One Ltd et al - Reasons for Ruling
FSD 0236/2024 (IKJ) · 2024-12-16
Case management-whether first return date of originating summons should serve as the substantive hearing-dispute as to whether proceeding should be continued as if commenced by writ-default position in the absence of agreement-Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision) Order 28 rules 4, 8, 9, Order 72 rule 4 (1)-(2)-FSD User’s Guide, Section B3. Civil Procedure; Company Law; Partnerships; Case Management
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0236/2024 (IKJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Kawaley J |
| Parties | Unicorn Biotech Ventures One Ltd et al - Reasons for Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2024-12-16 |
| Subject | Case management-whether first return date of originating summons should serve as the substantive hearing-dispute as to whether proceeding should be continued as if commenced by writ-default position in the absence of agreement-Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision) Order 28 rules 4, 8, 9, Order 72 rule 4 (1)-(2)-FSD User’s Guide, Section B3. Civil Procedure; Company Law; Partnerships; Case Management |
| Filename (current) | 24-12-16-Unicorn-Biotech-Ventures-One-Ltd-et-al-Reasons-for-Ruling.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | — | 2 |
| Grand Court Act | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.