Judgment
Credit Suisse London Nominees Ltd -v- Floreat Principal Investment Management Limited - Reasons for Decision
N/A
· FSD 0129/2024 (IKJ); FSD 0130/2024 (IKJ); FSD 0131/2024 (IKJ) · 2024-08-08
Creditors winding-up petitions-respondents’ application to adjourn petitions on the grounds of a crossclaim against the equitable owner of the petitioners’ shares-governing principles-relevance of pending application for leave to appeal against refusal of applications to stay enforcement of the costs orders upon which the petitions were based-Companies Act (2023 Revision), section 95 (1). Insolvency; Company Law; Creditors’ Winding‑Up; Civil Procedure
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | N/A |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0129/2024 (IKJ); FSD 0130/2024 (IKJ); FSD 0131/2024 (IKJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Kawaley J |
| Parties | Credit Suisse London Nominees Ltd -v- Floreat Principal Investment Management Limited - Reasons for Decision |
| Judgment Date | 2024-08-08 |
| Subject | Creditors winding-up petitions-respondents’ application to adjourn petitions on the grounds of a crossclaim against the equitable owner of the petitioners’ shares-governing principles-relevance of pending application for leave to appeal against refusal of applications to stay enforcement of the costs orders upon which the petitions were based-Companies Act (2023 Revision), section 95 (1). Insolvency; Company Law; Creditors’ Winding‑Up; Civil Procedure |
| Filename (current) | 24-08-08-Credit-Suisse-London-Nominees-Ltd-v-FPIML-et-al-Reasons-for-Decision.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | 95 | 3 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.