Judgment
Principal Investing Fund I Limited et al - Costs Ruling
FSD 0268/2021 (IKJ); FSD 0269/2021 (IKJ); FDS 0270/2021 (IKJ) · 2023-07-27
Costs of petition and reserved interlocutory costs orders-basis of taxation-when indemnity costs appropriate- whether the same standard of taxation should be applied to the proceedings as a whole costs of abandoned allegations-costs of amendments-costs of successful recusal application- Companies Winding Up Rules Order 24 rules 7-8- Grand Court Rules Order 62 rule 4 (11) and Preamble. Costs; Indemnity Costs; Winding‑Up; Company Law; Case Management; Amendments; Recusal; Civil Procedure
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0268/2021 (IKJ); FSD 0269/2021 (IKJ); FDS 0270/2021 (IKJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Kawaley J |
| Parties | Principal Investing Fund I Limited et al - Costs Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2023-07-27 |
| Subject | Costs of petition and reserved interlocutory costs orders-basis of taxation-when indemnity costs appropriate- whether the same standard of taxation should be applied to the proceedings as a whole costs of abandoned allegations-costs of amendments-costs of successful recusal application- Companies Winding Up Rules Order 24 rules 7-8- Grand Court Rules Order 62 rule 4 (11) and Preamble. Costs; Indemnity Costs; Winding‑Up; Company Law; Case Management; Amendments; Recusal; Civil Procedure |
| Filename (current) | 23-07-27-In-the-Matter-of-Principal-Investing-Fund-I-Limited-et-al---FSDs-268-269-and-270-of-2021-IKJ-Cost-Ruling.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | — | 1 |
| Companies Winding Up Rules (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.