Judgment
Wilma Ebanks v Tabitha Philander (as Guardian ad Litem and Interim Receiver) - Reasons for Decision
[2021] CIGC (G) 167
· G 0167/2021 · 2022-10-07
Recusal application made without proper factual basis - attorney acting in positions of conflict of interest - proliferation of litigation - concerns of the court. Recusal application; Allegations of bias; Conflict of interest; Guardian ad litem and receiver duties; Professional conduct concerns; Court’s overriding objective; Settlement suitability
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2021] CIGC (G) 167 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | G 0167/2021 |
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Smellie CJ |
| Parties | Wilma Ebanks v Tabitha Philander (as Guardian ad Litem and Interim Receiver) - Reasons for Decision |
| Judgment Date | 2022-10-07 |
| Subject | Recusal application made without proper factual basis - attorney acting in positions of conflict of interest - proliferation of litigation - concerns of the court. Recusal application; Allegations of bias; Conflict of interest; Guardian ad litem and receiver duties; Professional conduct concerns; Court’s overriding objective; Settlement suitability |
| Filename (current) | 22-10-07-Wilma-Ebanks-v-Tabitha-Philander.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.