Judgment
McGrath Tonner (A Firm) v Khatidja McLean - Reasons for Decision
[2022] CIGC (G) 184
· G 0184/2019 · 2022-06-08
Leave to appeal, factors to take into consideration. Leave to appeal – real prospect of success test; Court’s discretion to vary default judgment under GCR O19 r.9; Whether attorney’s fees can be assessed using taxation procedure in this context
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2022] CIGC (G) 184 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | G 0184/2019 |
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Walters J |
| Parties | McGrath Tonner (A Firm) v Khatidja McLean - Reasons for Decision |
| Judgment Date | 2022-06-08 |
| Subject | Leave to appeal, factors to take into consideration. Leave to appeal – real prospect of success test; Court’s discretion to vary default judgment under GCR O19 r.9; Whether attorney’s fees can be assessed using taxation procedure in this context |
| Filename (current) | 22-06-08-McGrath-Tonner-v-Khatidja-McLean.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Court of Appeal Act | 6 (f) | 1 |
| Court of Appeal Rules (subordinate) | 12 (6) | 1 |
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.