Judgment
John Felder v Sandra Hill - Reasons for Judgment
G 0212/2019 · 2021-09-02
The scope and application of GCR, O.19 r.9 - The legal principles under which the discretion of the Court to set aside a Default Judgment should be exercised - The importance of recognising the substantive rights of a Plaintiff duly and properly obtained in the form of a regular Judgment. Application to set aside default judgment under GCR O.19 r.9; Discretionary principles for setting aside regular judgment; Merits of proposed defence; Preservation of plaintiff’s substantive rights
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0212/2019 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | McMillan J |
| Parties | John Felder v Sandra Hill - Reasons for Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2021-09-02 |
| Subject | The scope and application of GCR, O.19 r.9 - The legal principles under which the discretion of the Court to set aside a Default Judgment should be exercised - The importance of recognising the substantive rights of a Plaintiff duly and properly obtained in the form of a regular Judgment. Application to set aside default judgment under GCR O.19 r.9; Discretionary principles for setting aside regular judgment; Merits of proposed defence; Preservation of plaintiff’s substantive rights |
| Filename (current) | 21-09-02-John-Felder-v-Sandra-Hill.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.