Judgment
In the Matter of BAF Latam Credit Fund - Judgment
[2021] CIGC (FSD) 24
· FSD 0024/2021 (RPJ) · 2021-03-16
Winding up petition-just and equitable-contributory-substitution for another entity-error jurisdiction-ss 92 and 94 Companies Act 2021-Companies Winding Up Rules (2018 Revision)-Court’s inherent jurisdiction to regulate procedure-discretion. Insolvency Law; Company Law; Civil Procedure
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2021] CIGC (FSD) 24 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0024/2021 (RPJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Parker J |
| Parties | In the Matter of BAF Latam Credit Fund - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2021-03-16 |
| Subject | Winding up petition-just and equitable-contributory-substitution for another entity-error jurisdiction-ss 92 and 94 Companies Act 2021-Companies Winding Up Rules (2018 Revision)-Court’s inherent jurisdiction to regulate procedure-discretion. Insolvency Law; Company Law; Civil Procedure |
| Filename (current) | 21-03-16-BAF-Latam-Credit-Fund.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | 92(e) and 94(1), 94 (3)(b), 99 | 6 |
| Companies Winding Up Rules (subordinate) | — | 2 |
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | 5(1) and 7 | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.