Segal J
IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
Of this total amount, $41
directors...); for ensuring that action
BH06’s debtors and potential
of SFPF's account with P
(i). ensuring legal obligations were satisfied by
printing, scanning, notary fees and
the circumstances and represents value for money (
Mr. Royle) spent an unjust
1267 (Mr. Sav
documents to Livelink - $2
matters - $102);
briefing: $204);
court hearing documents: $714
$2,380);
(d). the Plaintiffs identified the following
number of appointments from this Court. His
its subsidiaries, information relating to the matters
Neither the JRs nor
Up Rules, which were based on and
accounting firm of which the officeholders
characterisation of the assignment in his Second
predominantly to discuss BGNIC
administrative tasks which cannot be said to
(viii). I see no proper basis
(e). it was therefore appropriate and proper
and involvement in the case to make the
that the JRs should be able immediately