Judgment
Carol Angella Bennett v Henry Michael Diaz - Judgment
G 0215/2015 · 2020-01-28
Implied Repeal - Repugnance - Manifest Reformatory Purpose of Limitation Law - Application of the Rule in Pepper v Hart-Avoidance of Illogicality and Injustice. Limitation Law; Motor Vehicles Insurance Law; implied repeal; repugnance; Pepper v Hart principle; legislative intent; statutory interpretation; equitable discretion under s.39 Limitation Law
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0215/2015 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | McMillan J |
| Parties | Carol Angella Bennett v Henry Michael Diaz - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2020-01-28 |
| Subject | Implied Repeal - Repugnance - Manifest Reformatory Purpose of Limitation Law - Application of the Rule in Pepper v Hart-Avoidance of Illogicality and Injustice. Limitation Law; Motor Vehicles Insurance Law; implied repeal; repugnance; Pepper v Hart principle; legislative intent; statutory interpretation; equitable discretion under s.39 Limitation Law |
| Filename (current) | 20-01-28-Carol-Angella-Bennett-v-Henry-Michael-Diaz.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.