Judgment
Dorothy Messam v Kirk Market Ltd - Judgment
G 0065/2017 · 2019-11-26
Personal injury; application dismissal for want of prosecution and/or inordinate delay; Effect of Overriding Objective in Grand Court Rules; GCR 0.67/6/(1), Unless and until a copy of the order declaring that an attorney has ceased to be the attorney acting for the party is served on every party to the cause or matter he shall still be considered the attorney of the party until the final conclusion of the cause ort matter in the Court; application to dismiss for want of prosecution and/or inordinate delay; abuse of process; failure to prosecute claim since 2017; substituted service
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0065/2017 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Williams J |
| Parties | Dorothy Messam v Kirk Market Ltd - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2019-11-26 |
| Subject | Personal injury; application dismissal for want of prosecution and/or inordinate delay; Effect of Overriding Objective in Grand Court Rules; GCR 0.67/6/(1), Unless and until a copy of the order declaring that an attorney has ceased to be the attorney acting for the party is served on every party to the cause or matter he shall still be considered the attorney of the party until the final conclusion of the cause ort matter in the Court; application to dismiss for want of prosecution and/or inordinate delay; abuse of process; failure to prosecute claim since 2017; substituted service |
| Filename (current) | 19-11-26_dorothy_messam_v_kirk_market_ltd.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.