Goldring P, Martin JA, Morrison JA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF
developer, was not liable to the appell
in preference to the tiles chosen by Lor
wrongly excluded evidence given by Mr Ay
appeal give the appellant “three clear
Registrar, who will then give notice to
by the rules "upon such terms,
departure from the relevant provisions to justify our
After taking possession, the
The Aydocs went on
replacing them, is [sic]
7) Legal costs of CI$1
tiles themselves but with their installation”. And
out that the case had been adjourn
[the Aydocs’] claims”
the Plaintiffs does not satisfy this Court
Although, as I have
The admissibility issue 47
"45. (1) In
document, the form and contents of that
And finally, as far
on41. Fourthly, the
In my respectful view,
conferred on the court by O.
observed51, "[t]
given to it; and (iii)
consider what action to take in response to
tile damage: rather, it dismissed it
the statement; nor, save for the
to the wholly unsatisfactory way in