Judgment
Kevin Errol Clayton v Jeffrey DaCosta t/a Paint Pros and Ors - Reasons for Decision
G 0209/2012 · 2019-08-14
Limitation Law (1996 Revision); Interpretation of Sections 12 and 41; Third Party Proceedings; Abuse of Process; Time-Barred Claims; Contribution and Indemnity; The interpretation and application of Section 12 and Section 41 of the Limitation Law (1996 Revision); The intent and purpose of the Limitation Law; The need for a thematic approach to statutory construction
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0209/2012 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | McMillan J |
| Parties | Kevin Errol Clayton v Jeffrey DaCosta t/a Paint Pros and Ors - Reasons for Decision |
| Judgment Date | 2019-08-14 |
| Subject | Limitation Law (1996 Revision); Interpretation of Sections 12 and 41; Third Party Proceedings; Abuse of Process; Time-Barred Claims; Contribution and Indemnity; The interpretation and application of Section 12 and Section 41 of the Limitation Law (1996 Revision); The intent and purpose of the Limitation Law; The need for a thematic approach to statutory construction |
| Filename (current) | 19-08-14_kevin_errol_clayton_v_jeffrey_dacosta_as_paint_pros_and_ors.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.