Judgment

McGlynn Enterprises Ltd v Magda-Zoe Embury - Ruling on Costs

G 0049/2018 · 2019-06-26

Wasted Costs; Indemnity Costs; Summary Judgment; Wasted Costs; Attorneys; proceedings commenced of the Court's own motion; Wasted Costs; 0.62, r.12(5); need for supporting affidavit to be served on attorney personally; Indemnity costs; summary judgment; hopeless cases

Download PDF

Full metadata

Cause Number	G 0049/2018
Court	CIGC (Civ)
Judge	Gunn J
Parties	McGlynn Enterprises Ltd v Magda-Zoe Embury - Ruling on Costs
Judgment Date	2019-06-26
Subject	Wasted Costs; Indemnity Costs; Summary Judgment; Wasted Costs; Attorneys; proceedings commenced of the Court's own motion; Wasted Costs; 0.62, r.12(5); need for supporting affidavit to be served on attorney personally; Indemnity costs; summary judgment; hopeless cases
Filename (current)	19-06-26_mcglynn_enterprise_ltd_v_embury_magda-zoe_embury.pdf

Full text13 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division

Cause No. G 0049/2018

Between

McGlynn Enterprises Ltd

- v -

Magda-Zoe Embury - Ruling on Costs

Before
Gunn J

Judgment delivered 2019-06-26

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
RULING AS TO COSTS
17.2 ...the correspondence was

Additionally, the Plaintiff complains that
17.5 Ms Embury repeatedly

Both in correspondence3 and

Much of Mr Chapman’s
(a) the attorney whom it considers to
(a) The Plaintiff had foreshadow

Mr Chapman submitted that in

Given the Plaintiff’s failure

In Al Sadik v

The words “unreason
The Law - Indemnity Costs
both Wates Construction Ltd. v.

While summary judgment is a
(7) Where the unsuccessful allegations are
The Correspondence

Mr Chapman did make a

There are no other matters

The manner in which Mr
ORDER (1) The Plaintiff’s
ENDNOTE: Following the circulation of my

Find similar