Judgment
RCIPA, Pinnock and Ors v Commissioner of Police and Attorney General - Judgment
[2016] CIGC (G) 4
· G 0004/2016 · 2018-03-15
Challenge to mandatory retirement age of 55 for non-gazetted police officers; alleged discrimination based on age and national origin; re-engagement policy requiring re-hired officers to return at lower rank; claims under sections 9, 16, and 19 of the Bill of Rights; court found no breach of rights; judgment for Defendants
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2016] CIGC (G) 4 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | G 0004/2016 |
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Hall J |
| Parties | RCIPA, Pinnock and Ors v Commissioner of Police and Attorney General - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2018-03-15 |
| Subject | Challenge to mandatory retirement age of 55 for non-gazetted police officers; alleged discrimination based on age and national origin; re-engagement policy requiring re-hired officers to return at lower rank; claims under sections 9, 16, and 19 of the Bill of Rights; court found no breach of rights; judgment for Defendants |
| Filename (current) | 18-03-15_rcips_pinnock__ors_v_cop__ag.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Police Act | 19 and 20, 20, 20 (1), 20 and 21, 21 (7), 21(7) | 40 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.