Segal J
IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
has been entered into by and between the
While expressing some reluctance to grant
Litigation Funders. Subsequently the
costs (the *Award Debt*
These amounts included the expenses to be incurred
(g). if the Plaintiff decided to abandon
(k). the governing law of the
Mr Kish submitted that
Nowadays, though, we witness the
1
entitled to take that course and the
although the Plaintiff has not been able to
party provided assistance with litigation in return for
As Underhill J had
others in [which] the medd
liability for costs in the event of
57, Elliot v CIHSA
agreement. The funding agreement involved the
(e). what impact if any should the
Recognising that the critical
for achieving indirect control. The concern is
(f). *the amount of profit that
opportunity to litigate them on terms
effectively a right to terminate at will
It appeared to me that
importance to the Defendant and the commercial
conduct litigation in a foreign country if such