Judgment
Securities and Exchange Commission v Wyly et al - Judgment
[2025] CIGC (FSD) 66
· FSD 0047/2016 (CQJ) · 2016-08-29
Application under Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Order 1978; Hague Convention judicial assistance; whether US SEC proceedings were “civil”; sufficiency of particularity under s.2(4)(b) EPOJ; distinction between particularised requests vs impermissible third‑party discovery; compendious descriptions of documents; obligations of trust officers; wide but permissible scope of documents; comity principles
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2025] CIGC (FSD) 66 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0047/2016 (CQJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Quin J |
| Parties | Securities and Exchange Commission v Wyly et al - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2016-08-29 |
| Subject | Application under Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Order 1978; Hague Convention judicial assistance; whether US SEC proceedings were “civil”; sufficiency of particularity under s.2(4)(b) EPOJ; distinction between particularised requests vs impermissible third‑party discovery; compendious descriptions of documents; obligations of trust officers; wide but permissible scope of documents; comity principles |
| Filename (current) | 16-08-29-Securities-and-Exchange-Commission-v-Wyly-et-al.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Confidential Relationships (Preservation) Law | 4 | 1 |
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | 70 | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.