Robert Woods v Floris Thompson (1st Defendant), Saxon MG Insurance Co Ltd (2nd Defendant) - Judgment
Insurance Law; Civil procedure and practice; Motor Vehicle Insurance (Third Party Risks) Law (2012 Revision), s.4, 15 and 17; Limitation Law (1996 Revision), s. 30, GCR. 0.20, 0.14, 0.14A, 0.15, Rule 6; Whether Third Party can properly sue Insurance Company for consequential relief, before obtaining judgment against insured; Whether declaration would be just in relation to all parties; Whether the most effective way of resolving the issues; Application to Strike Out and Summary Judgment Application by insurer. Whether a third party can sue an insurer before obtaining judgment against the insured; Application to strike out and for summary judgment
| Cause Number | G 0229/2015 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Mangatal J |
| Parties | Robert Woods v Floris Thompson (1st Defendant), Saxon MG Insurance Co Ltd (2nd Defendant) - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2016-07-12 |
| Subject | Insurance Law; Civil procedure and practice; Motor Vehicle Insurance (Third Party Risks) Law (2012 Revision), s.4, 15 and 17; Limitation Law (1996 Revision), s. 30, GCR. 0.20, 0.14, 0.14A, 0.15, Rule 6; Whether Third Party can properly sue Insurance Company for consequential relief, before obtaining judgment against insured; Whether declaration would be just in relation to all parties; Whether the most effective way of resolving the issues; Application to Strike Out and Summary Judgment Application by insurer. Whether a third party can sue an insurer before obtaining judgment against the insured; Application to strike out and for summary judgment |
| Filename (current) | 16-07-12_woods_v_thompson_and_saxon_mg.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.