7,424 judgments 29,712 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

Alva Suckoo and Diane Martinez v Ignition Technology Group Ltd - Ruling

G 0129/2015 · 2016-05-31

Application to Amend Writ and Statement of Claim and Substitute Plaintiff; Costs; Whether to be Taxed Immediately; Application to Strike Out Pleading; Summary Judgment Application; Defence of Tender; Order 20, Order 18 r.16, and r.19, Order14, 14A and Order 62 r.9 of the Grand Court Rules, 1995 (Revised Edition). Amendment of pleadings and substitution of plaintiff; Summary judgment and strike out applications; Interpretation of asset purchase agreement and earn-out provisions; Defence of tender before action

Full metadata
Cause Number G 0129/2015
Court CIGC (Civ)
Judge Mangatal J
Parties Alva Suckoo and Diane Martinez v Ignition Technology Group Ltd - Ruling
Judgment Date 2016-05-31
Subject Application to Amend Writ and Statement of Claim and Substitute Plaintiff; Costs; Whether to be Taxed Immediately; Application to Strike Out Pleading; Summary Judgment Application; Defence of Tender; Order 20, Order 18 r.16, and r.19, Order14, 14A and Order 62 r.9 of the Grand Court Rules, 1995 (Revised Edition). Amendment of pleadings and substitution of plaintiff; Summary judgment and strike out applications; Interpretation of asset purchase agreement and earn-out provisions; Defence of tender before action
Filename (current) 16-05-31_suckoo_and_martinez_v_ignition_technology_ltd.pdf
Full text6 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
Cause No. G 0129/2015
Between
Alva Suckoo and Diane Martinez
- v -
Ignition Technology Group Ltd - Ruling
Before
Mangatal J
Judgment delivered 2016-05-31

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
into negotiations for the sale of the assets

Application to substitute plaintiff; 2
PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR
Ignition would have been entitled to tender
(d) As a result of the manner
may forthwith order the costs of any
(2) This rule applies to every
(2) Upon such determination the court
(3) This rule shall, so
full for some of the Assumed Contracts

Further, that even after

Mr. Kennedy submits that
the parties’ rights to full discovery and
(c) Any determination of the question of
As a result of this interpretation Counsel states

Further canons of construction
claim has no prospect of success or that
delay a consideration of this application. It
clear and precise terms - see 1
could have tendered that amount into Court

I therefore make the following

Find similar