7,424 judgments 29,712 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

Ian Stokoe and David Walker (as JOLs of Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund Ltd) v CITCO Global Custody NV - Ruling

FSD 0167/2014 (NCJ) · 2016-05-23

Validity of writ after substitution of defendant; GCR O.20 r.5 amendment to correct party name; whether October 2015 amendment implicitly extended validity for service; service out of jurisdiction; interpretation of GCR O.6 r.8; distinction between original and substituted defendants for timing of validity

Full metadata
Cause Number FSD 0167/2014 (NCJ)
Court CIGC (FSD)
Judge Clifford J
Parties Ian Stokoe and David Walker (as JOLs of Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund Ltd) v CITCO Global Custody NV - Ruling
Judgment Date 2016-05-23
Subject Validity of writ after substitution of defendant; GCR O.20 r.5 amendment to correct party name; whether October 2015 amendment implicitly extended validity for service; service out of jurisdiction; interpretation of GCR O.6 r.8; distinction between original and substituted defendants for timing of validity
Filename (current) 16-05-23-Ian-Stokoe-David-Walker-v-CITCO-Global-Custody-N-V.pdf
Full text6 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Financial Services Division
Cause No. FSD 0167/2014 (NCJ)
Between
Ian Stokoe and David Walker (as JOLs of Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund Ltd)
- v -
CITCO Global Custody NV - Ruling
Before
Clifford J
Judgment delivered 2016-05-23

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
RULING Introduction 1.
Procedural History

The
October 2015² ("

Here it is contended
obtain an Order expressly extending the validity
RSC Order 20, rule
and that the proper plaintiffs were its charter
“For the purpose of service, a writ
CA). This requirement applies in respect of
defendant the court may by order extend

So, on the basis

Hobhouse J granted Arm
without service, effectively to renew the writ
“For the purpose of service a writ (
the view that such extension can safely and
Conclusion

The Defendant’s

Find similar