R v Ingrid Scott - Ruling

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C

¶ [2] At the close of the Crown
evidence upon which the jury could properly
purchased with an airline or that a

¶ [8] In relation to Count 1
flight itinerary and informed her that a boarding

¶ [13] Ms. Bodden contends

¶ [15] Mr. Maun told
the flight ticket would cost $37
to the customers that the Defendant was mis

¶ [21] Ms. Salako reminded

¶ [23] Similarly, Ms. Sal
witnesses’ evidence and other matters

¶ [28] The Court recognises the
submissions in relation to that count and