Judgment
In the matter of Integra Group - Reasons for Order for Costs
FSD 0092/2014 (AJJ) · 2015-09-10
Section 238 Companies Law appraisal; Costs discretion under s.238(14); Principles for allocating costs between company and dissenters; Analogy to scheme of arrangement costs; Distinction between passive dissenters and active litigating dissenters; Whether dissenters were “successful party”; Application of GCR O.62 r.4; Determining “success” in valuation outcomes; Fair value comparisons vs company’s offer and expert evidence
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0092/2014 (AJJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Jones J |
| Parties | In the matter of Integra Group - Reasons for Order for Costs |
| Judgment Date | 2015-09-10 |
| Subject | Section 238 Companies Law appraisal; Costs discretion under s.238(14); Principles for allocating costs between company and dissenters; Analogy to scheme of arrangement costs; Distinction between passive dissenters and active litigating dissenters; Whether dissenters were “successful party”; Application of GCR O.62 r.4; Determining “success” in valuation outcomes; Fair value comparisons vs company’s offer and expert evidence |
| Filename (current) | 15-09-10-Integra-Group-In-re.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | 238(14), 86 and 87 | 5 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.