Judgment
Tempo Group Ltd and others v Fortuna Development Corporation and others - Judgment
FSD 0125/2012 (AHJ) · 2015-03-31
Alleged “Fortuna Agreement” for equal board representation; Whether a quasi‑partnership existed between principal shareholders; Validity of 2004 EGM removing Dr. Chen; Beneficial and legal ownership of Maxima Samoa (Philip Niu vs Pearl Niu); Validity of bearer share issuance; Authority to vote Maxima’s shares; Application of Samoan law and Duomatic principle; Whether EGM resolutions were a nullity.
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0125/2012 (AHJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Henderson J |
| Parties | Tempo Group Ltd and others v Fortuna Development Corporation and others - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2015-03-31 |
| Subject | Alleged “Fortuna Agreement” for equal board representation; Whether a quasi‑partnership existed between principal shareholders; Validity of 2004 EGM removing Dr. Chen; Beneficial and legal ownership of Maxima Samoa (Philip Niu vs Pearl Niu); Validity of bearer share issuance; Authority to vote Maxima’s shares; Application of Samoan law and Duomatic principle; Whether EGM resolutions were a nullity. |
| Filename (current) | 15-03-31-Tempo-v-Fortuna-Development-Corporation.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.