Judgment
R v David Tamasa et al - Reason for Judgment (CNB Robbery)
[2015] CICR 1
· Crim App 0023/2013 · 2014-11-21
Robbery, contrary to section 242(1) of the Penal Code; possession of an unlicenced firearm with intent to commit an offence, contrary to section 18 of the Firearms Law (2008 Revision); Material irregularity under Police Law s.149(2); Jury directions on silence; Application of proviso under Court of Appeal Law; Retrial order
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2015] CICR 1 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | Crim App 0023/2013 |
| Court | CICA (Crim) |
| Judge | Chadwick P, Mottley JA, Rix JA |
| Parties | R v David Tamasa et al - Reason for Judgment (CNB Robbery) |
| Judgment Date | 2014-11-21 |
| Subject | Robbery, contrary to section 242(1) of the Penal Code; possession of an unlicenced firearm with intent to commit an offence, contrary to section 18 of the Firearms Law (2008 Revision); Material irregularity under Police Law s.149(2); Jury directions on silence; Application of proviso under Court of Appeal Law; Retrial order |
| Filename (current) | 14-11-21_r_v_david_tamasa_et_al.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Police Act | 149(2) | 4 |
| Court of Appeal Act | 9(1), 9(2) | 3 |
| Firearms Act | 18 | 1 |
| Penal Code | 242(1) | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.