Judgment
Tempo Group Ltd and Others v Fortuna Development Corp and Others - Ruling
FSD 0125/2012 (AHJ) · 2014-09-10
Hearsay admissibility under Evidence Law (2011 Revision); Witness beyond the seas; Failure to serve hearsay notice with witness statements; GCR O.38 r.21–26; Rule 2A(9) variance; No discretion to exclude hearsay where rule requirements met; Weight vs admissibility distinction
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0125/2012 (AHJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Henderson J |
| Parties | Tempo Group Ltd and Others v Fortuna Development Corp and Others - Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2014-09-10 |
| Subject | Hearsay admissibility under Evidence Law (2011 Revision); Witness beyond the seas; Failure to serve hearsay notice with witness statements; GCR O.38 r.21–26; Rule 2A(9) variance; No discretion to exclude hearsay where rule requirements met; Weight vs admissibility distinction |
| Filename (current) | 14-09-10-Teimp-Group-and-Others-v-Fortuna-and-Others.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.