Judgment
In re SPhinX Group of Companies (In Official Liquidation) - Judgment
[2013] KCIGC 1
· FSD 0016/2009 (ASCJ) · 2012-12-21
Whether Deutsche Bank’s post‑meeting acquisition of all Class 10 shares constituted a material change requiring reconvening of class meetings; whether the change could amount to a “blot on the scheme” under the Equitable Life / Telewest principles; whether a reasonable scheme participant, acting in their own economic interests, might have changed their vote had the new information been known; whether the statutory class majorities were satisfied without a further meeting; whether the Scheme could proceed to sanction subject to establishing reserves for indemnity claimants and the Beus Gilbert contingent fee claim
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2013] KCIGC 1 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0016/2009 (ASCJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Smellie CJ |
| Parties | In re SPhinX Group of Companies (In Official Liquidation) - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2012-12-21 |
| Subject | Whether Deutsche Bank’s post‑meeting acquisition of all Class 10 shares constituted a material change requiring reconvening of class meetings; whether the change could amount to a “blot on the scheme” under the Equitable Life / Telewest principles; whether a reasonable scheme participant, acting in their own economic interests, might have changed their vote had the new information been known; whether the statutory class majorities were satisfied without a further meeting; whether the Scheme could proceed to sanction subject to establishing reserves for indemnity claimants and the Beus Gilbert contingent fee claim |
| Filename (current) | 12-12-21-Sphinx-Group-of-Companies-In-re.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | — | 2 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.