Judgment
Riad Tawfiq Al‑Sadik v Investcorp Bank BSC and Investcorp entities - Ruling on Costs
FSD 0047/2009 (AJJ) · 2012-07-16
Indemnity vs standard basis costs under GCR O.62 rr.4(11) and 11(2); substantive vs procedural misconduct; scope of “improper, unreasonable or negligent” conduct; principles of wasted costs; jurisdiction to order interim payment on account of costs; inherent jurisdiction to supplement cost rules; stay of taxation pending appeal; partial indemnity (collateral contract claim); distinction between nominee responsibility and party conduct; proportionality and hourly‑rate caps; applicability of Rule 18 on foreign lawyers
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0047/2009 (AJJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Jones J |
| Parties | Riad Tawfiq Al‑Sadik v Investcorp Bank BSC and Investcorp entities - Ruling on Costs |
| Judgment Date | 2012-07-16 |
| Subject | Indemnity vs standard basis costs under GCR O.62 rr.4(11) and 11(2); substantive vs procedural misconduct; scope of “improper, unreasonable or negligent” conduct; principles of wasted costs; jurisdiction to order interim payment on account of costs; inherent jurisdiction to supplement cost rules; stay of taxation pending appeal; partial indemnity (collateral contract claim); distinction between nominee responsibility and party conduct; proportionality and hourly‑rate caps; applicability of Rule 18 on foreign lawyers |
| Filename (current) | 12-07-16-Riad-Tawfiq-Al-Sadik-v-Investcorp-Bank-BSC-et-al.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.