Judgment
Gray 1 CPB, LLC v Gulfstream Finance Inc; Bruce Elieff; Kathy Elieff; Does 1–50 - Reasons for Judgment
FSD 0010/2012 (ASCJ) · 2012-02-17
Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Order 1978; Hague Convention; jurisdictional pre‑conditions for assistance; admissibility and specificity of “particular documents”; limits on pre‑trial discovery; principles in Rio Tinto and United States v Carver; avoidance of oppression; ability to appoint examiner; allowance of videotaped examinations; cross‑border enforcement of civil evidence requests; regulatory record‑keeping obligations supporting likelihood of possession
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0010/2012 (ASCJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Smellie CJ |
| Parties | Gray 1 CPB, LLC v Gulfstream Finance Inc; Bruce Elieff; Kathy Elieff; Does 1–50 - Reasons for Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2012-02-17 |
| Subject | Evidence (Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Order 1978; Hague Convention; jurisdictional pre‑conditions for assistance; admissibility and specificity of “particular documents”; limits on pre‑trial discovery; principles in Rio Tinto and United States v Carver; avoidance of oppression; ability to appoint examiner; allowance of videotaped examinations; cross‑border enforcement of civil evidence requests; regulatory record‑keeping obligations supporting likelihood of possession |
| Filename (current) | 12-02-17-Gray-1-CPB-LLC-v-Gulfstream-Finance-Inc-Others.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.