Judgment
Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Brothers Co v Saad Investments Company Ltd, Maan Al‑Sanea and Others - Ruling
FSD 0054/2009 (ASCJ) · 2011-12-02
Basis on which Maples Defendants recover costs following discontinuance; Whether indemnity costs justified for non‑WFO litigation; Distinction between WFO‑related indemnity costs (admitted) vs general action costs; Test for indemnity basis under GCR O.62 r.4(11); Whether AHAB’s conduct was improper, unreasonable or negligent; Court finds no exceptional misconduct; Costs on standard basis; No requirement to disclose identity of third‑party funder of defendants’ costs
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0054/2009 (ASCJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Smellie CJ |
| Parties | Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Brothers Co v Saad Investments Company Ltd, Maan Al‑Sanea and Others - Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2011-12-02 |
| Subject | Basis on which Maples Defendants recover costs following discontinuance; Whether indemnity costs justified for non‑WFO litigation; Distinction between WFO‑related indemnity costs (admitted) vs general action costs; Test for indemnity basis under GCR O.62 r.4(11); Whether AHAB’s conduct was improper, unreasonable or negligent; Court finds no exceptional misconduct; Costs on standard basis; No requirement to disclose identity of third‑party funder of defendants’ costs |
| Filename (current) | 11-12-02-Ahab-v-Saad-Investments-Company-Limited-and-Maan-Al-Sanea-and-others.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.