Judgment
Adrianus Johannes Heinen v Pieter Le Comte - Ruling
FSD 0001/2009 (AFJ) · 2011-09-28
Costs following just‑and‑equitable winding‑up order; Court of Appeal remittal on indemnity‑costs issue; whether late‑disclosed NY correspondence (733 Properties security arrangement) constituted exceptional circumstances; relevance of conduct to petition issues; indemnity costs refused; cross‑appeal costs awarded to respondent
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0001/2009 (AFJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Foster J |
| Parties | Adrianus Johannes Heinen v Pieter Le Comte - Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2011-09-28 |
| Subject | Costs following just‑and‑equitable winding‑up order; Court of Appeal remittal on indemnity‑costs issue; whether late‑disclosed NY correspondence (733 Properties security arrangement) constituted exceptional circumstances; relevance of conduct to petition issues; indemnity costs refused; cross‑appeal costs awarded to respondent |
| Filename (current) | 11-09-28-Adrianus-Johannes-Heinen-v-Pieter-Le-Comte.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | 99 | 3 |
| Companies Winding Up Rules (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.