Judgment
Tempo Group Ltd v Fortuna Development Corporation - Ruling
[2025] CIGC (FSD) 66
· FSD 0082/2011 (AHJ) · 2011-08-23
Admissibility of affidavit evidence; limits on hearsay in interlocutory applications; exclusion of opinion, argument, and double-hearsay portions of an inspector‑related affidavit; guidance on what evidence remains admissible in strike‑out proceedings for delay; direction permitting parties to freely contact Inspectors for evidence
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2025] CIGC (FSD) 66 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0082/2011 (AHJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Henderson J |
| Parties | Tempo Group Ltd v Fortuna Development Corporation - Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2011-08-23 |
| Subject | Admissibility of affidavit evidence; limits on hearsay in interlocutory applications; exclusion of opinion, argument, and double-hearsay portions of an inspector‑related affidavit; guidance on what evidence remains admissible in strike‑out proceedings for delay; direction permitting parties to freely contact Inspectors for evidence |
| Filename (current) | 11-08-23-Tempo-Group-Ltd-and-Fortuna-Development-Corp.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.