Judgment
In re Saad Cayman Ltd; Singularis Holdings Ltd; Saad Investments Finance Co Ltd; Saad Investment Companies Nos. 2, 3, 8, 9, 10 - Ruling
[2011] CIGC (FSD) 0015/2010
· FSD 0015/2010; FSD 0016/2010; FSD 0036/2010; FSD 0037/2010; FSD 0038/2010; FSD 0039/2010; FSD 0041/2010; FSD 0035/2010 (ASCJ) · 2011-06-14
JOLs seek substituted service on Maan Al‑Sanea; extension and reinforcement of s.101/103 orders; attachment of penal notices; court upholds substituted service where Al‑Sanea evading service; no Saudi‑law impediment to Cayman orders; JOLs complied with CWR O.7 disclosure; jurisdictional challenge raised too late; penal notices endorsed; 21‑day compliance window; 7‑day window to apply to set aside
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2011] CIGC (FSD) 0015/2010 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0015/2010; FSD 0016/2010; FSD 0036/2010; FSD 0037/2010; FSD 0038/2010; FSD 0039/2010; FSD 0041/2010; FSD 0035/2010 (ASCJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Smellie CJ |
| Parties | In re Saad Cayman Ltd; Singularis Holdings Ltd; Saad Investments Finance Co Ltd; Saad Investment Companies Nos. 2, 3, 8, 9, 10 - Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2011-06-14 |
| Subject | JOLs seek substituted service on Maan Al‑Sanea; extension and reinforcement of s.101/103 orders; attachment of penal notices; court upholds substituted service where Al‑Sanea evading service; no Saudi‑law impediment to Cayman orders; JOLs complied with CWR O.7 disclosure; jurisdictional challenge raised too late; penal notices endorsed; 21‑day compliance window; 7‑day window to apply to set aside |
| Filename (current) | 11-06-14-Saad-Cayman-Ltd-In-re.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Companies Act | 101 and 103 | 5 |
| Companies Winding Up Rules, 2008 (subordinate) | — | 1 |
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | — | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.