Judgment
In re Parmalat Capital Finance Limited (In Official Liquidation) - Judgment
FSD 0063/2009 (AHJ) · 2011-03-21
Appeal of rejected proof of debt; liquidators initially refused proof due to inadequate identity evidence; whether JOLs have power to reconsider rejection under WUR Order 16; analysis of O.16 rr.1(4), 5(1), 17, 18, 20–21; court holds JOLs may reconsider absent express prohibition, provided no prejudice to third parties; appeal allowed and proof admitted; no costs to creditor due to failure to monitor email
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0063/2009 (AHJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Henderson J |
| Parties | In re Parmalat Capital Finance Limited (In Official Liquidation) - Judgment |
| Judgment Date | 2011-03-21 |
| Subject | Appeal of rejected proof of debt; liquidators initially refused proof due to inadequate identity evidence; whether JOLs have power to reconsider rejection under WUR Order 16; analysis of O.16 rr.1(4), 5(1), 17, 18, 20–21; court holds JOLs may reconsider absent express prohibition, provided no prejudice to third parties; appeal allowed and proof admitted; no costs to creditor due to failure to monitor email |
| Filename (current) | 11-03-21-Parmalat-Finance-Ltd-In-re.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.