Judgment
Embassy Investments Limited v Houston Casualty Company - Ruling
G 0278/2005 (consolidated with G 0098/2006; G 0127/2006; G 0128/2006) · 2010-12-14
Amendment of Defence; Introduction of counterclaim; Defamation; GCR O.20 r.5; GCR O.18 r.9; Post‑pleading events; Modern approach to amendments; Distinction from Eshelby; Convenience and case management; Costs in the cause
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0278/2005 (consolidated with G 0098/2006; G 0127/2006; G 0128/2006) |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Smellie CJ |
| Parties | Embassy Investments Limited v Houston Casualty Company - Ruling |
| Judgment Date | 2010-12-14 |
| Subject | Amendment of Defence; Introduction of counterclaim; Defamation; GCR O.20 r.5; GCR O.18 r.9; Post‑pleading events; Modern approach to amendments; Distinction from Eshelby; Convenience and case management; Costs in the cause |
| Filename (current) | 10-12-14-Embassy-Investments-Limited-v-Houston-Investments-Company.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | 5 | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.