Judgment
In re Freerider Ltd - Reasons for Order
[2025] CIGC (FSD) 48
· FSD 0048/2009 (AFJ) · 2010-03-09
Security for costs; Whether GCR O.23 applies in CWR proceedings; Interpretation of CWR O.1 r.2 and O.1 r.4; Inherent jurisdiction limits; Distinction between CWR scheme and GCR powers; No jurisdiction to order security for costs in winding up petitions governed by CWR
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2025] CIGC (FSD) 48 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0048/2009 (AFJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Judge | Foster J |
| Parties | In re Freerider Ltd - Reasons for Order |
| Judgment Date | 2010-03-09 |
| Subject | Security for costs; Whether GCR O.23 applies in CWR proceedings; Interpretation of CWR O.1 r.2 and O.1 r.4; Inherent jurisdiction limits; Distinction between CWR scheme and GCR powers; No jurisdiction to order security for costs in winding up petitions governed by CWR |
| Filename (current) | 10-05-09-Freerider-Ltd-In-re.pdf |
Legislation cited
| Statute | Sections cited | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Court Rules - Vol I - Orders (subordinate) | 23 | 3 |
| Companies Winding Up Rules, 2008 (subordinate) | — | 2 |
| Companies Act | — | 1 |
| Grand Court Act | 18 (2) | 1 |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.