Judgment
Coutts and Co (Cayman) Ltd v Jerry Lindzon and Others - Reasons
G 0153/1995 · 1996-09-13
Appointment of guardian ad litem for minor beneficiaries in trust litigation; Principles under Grand Court Rules Order 80; Independence and impartiality vs familial connection; Dual appointment of attorney as guardian and solicitor; Analysis of Loorham v Loorham and comparative case law; Court upholds appointment of attorney as guardian subject to safeguards
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0153/1995 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Smellie J |
| Parties | Coutts and Co (Cayman) Ltd v Jerry Lindzon and Others - Reasons |
| Judgment Date | 1996-09-13 |
| Subject | Appointment of guardian ad litem for minor beneficiaries in trust litigation; Principles under Grand Court Rules Order 80; Independence and impartiality vs familial connection; Dual appointment of attorney as guardian and solicitor; Analysis of Loorham v Loorham and comparative case law; Court upholds appointment of attorney as guardian subject to safeguards |
| Filename (current) | 96-09-13-COUTTS-AND-CO-CAYMAN-LIMITED-v-JERRY-LINDZON.pdf |
The full text of this document is available to readers on this page. It is not served to automated crawlers.