7,424 judgments 29,712 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

Brinsley Danville Lazzari (Executor of the Estate of Eslie Earle Lazzari) v Leon Lazzari and others - Order

G 0203/1992 · 1995-07-17

Application to strike out; Summary procedure; Leave to appeal; Security for costs

Full metadata
Full text17 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
Cause No. G 0203/1992
Between
Brinsley Danville Lazzari (Executor of the Estate of Eslie Earle Lazzari)
- v -
Leon Lazzari and others - Order
Before
Harre CJ
Judgment delivered 1995-07-17

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS
HOLDEN AT GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN

CAUSE NO. 203 OF 1992

BETWEEN
BRINSLEY DANVILLE LAZZARI
EXECUTOR OF THE WILL OF THE ESTATE OF
ESLIE EARLE LAZZARI
PLAINTIFF

AND
(1) LEON LAZZARI
(2) FREDA LAZZARI
(3) PEDRO LAZZARI
DEFENDANTS

For the Plaintiff: Mr. Steven Roy
For the Defendants Mr. Pierre LaMontagne

HARRE C.J.
ORDER

It is only in the most exceptional case that the Court should embark on hearing such an application as this on the morning of the trial. And this summary procedure should not be resorted to except in plain and obvious cases.

It is already apparent that this, if heard, will be a matter for considerable argument. These are matters which are best dealt with as part of the trial.

Accordingly I decline to hear the plaintiff's application to strike out.

Leave to appeal against the Court's refusal to hear the plaintiff's
summons to strike out granted.

Plaintiff's attorney will use utmost endeavours to have this matters set down before the Court of Appeal during its sitting commencing on 31st July.

Liberty to apply in the event of the matter not coming on during that sitting.

Security for costs of appeal set at $750.00

Subject to the above cause stayed pending further order of this Court.

Costs of these applications to be costs in the cause.

G. E. Harre
Chief Justice

17th July, 1995.

Find similar