7,424 judgments 29,721 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

In re Bankruptcy Petition against Ivan Farrington - Reasons for Decision

G 0634/1977 · 1978-06-13

Bankruptcy Law - validity of petition; Non-compliance with Bankruptcy Rules; Effect of undated affidavit and unsigned JP; Judgment debt stayed - petition cannot be founded on non-payable debt

Full metadata
Legislation cited
Statute Sections cited Mentions
Bankruptcy Act 29 1
Registered Land Act 127 (1) (c) 1
Full text16 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
Cause No. G 0634/1977
In re Bankruptcy Petition against Ivan Farrington - Reasons for Decision
Before
Summerfield J
Judgment delivered 1978-06-13

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
Cause No. 634 of 1977
13th June, 1978.
In the matter of a Bankruptcy Petition
against IVAN FARRINGTON
Petition of KARL R. BRANDON

REASONS FOR DECISION

These proceedings were brought on in Chambers pursuant to section 29 of the Bankruptcy Law read with rule 4 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

The petition in bankruptcy was filed on 9 December 1977.

Under rule 14 of the Bankruptcy Rules it is the duty of the Judge to examine any petition filed.

The affidavit in support of the petition purports to be sworn before a justice of the peace who has not signed it. It is also undated.

Rule 11 of the Bankruptcy Rules was not complied with.

The petitioner's attention was drawn to these defects by letter dated 28 March 1978. A reminder was sent on 11 April 1978.

No action has since been taken by the petitioner.

Meanwhile a caution on land owned by the alleged debtor remains on the Register, having been filed by the petitioner under section 127 (1) (c) of the Registered Land Law, inhibiting dealings therewith.

The foregoing are all matters of record on the file.

Furthermore, this court cannot but take judicial notice of proceedings before it and rulings given thereon. It is clear from related proceedings between the parties that the judgment debt on which the petition is founded is not yet payable, a stay of execution having been granted.

Those related proceedings are cause No. 634 of 1977, the ruling setting out the history of the matter generally and removing the effect from 5th July 1978, i.e. long after the date of the petition, is incorporated referentially in this.

A petition in bankruptcy cannot be founded on a debt not

For the foregoing reasons the petition was dismissed pursuant to rule 16 (a) of the Bankruptcy Rules.

Sir John Summerfield, Chief Justice

Find similar